4.3 Article

Identification of LRP-1 as an endocytosis and recycling receptor for β1-integrin in thyroid cancer cells

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 45, 页码 78614-78632

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20201

关键词

LRP-1; beta 1-integrin; cancer; endocytosis; recycling

资金

  1. Ligue National Contre Le Cancer (CCIR-Grand Est)
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  3. Universite de Reims Champagne-Ardenne
  4. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  5. French Society for Extracellular Matrix Biology (SFBMEc)
  6. French Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (SFBBM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LRP-1 is a large endocytic receptor mediating the clearance of various molecules from the extracellular matrix. LRP-1 was reported to control focal adhesion turnover to optimize the adhesion-deadhesion balance to support invasion. To better understand how LRP-1 coordinates cell-extracellular matrix interface, we explored its ability to regulate cell surface integrins in thyroid carcinomas. Using an antibody approach, we demonstrated that beta 1-integrin levels were increased at the plasma membrane under LRP1 silencing or upon RAP treatment, used as LRP-1 antagonist. Our data revealed that LRP-1 binds with both inactive and active beta 1-integrin conformations and identified the extracellular ligand-binding domains II or IV of LRP-1 as sufficient to bind beta 1-integrin. Using a recombinant beta 1-integrin, we demonstrated that LRP-1 acts as a regulator of beta 1-integrin intracellular traffic. Moreover, RAP or LRP-1 blocking antibodies decreased up to 36% the number of beta 1-integrin-containing endosomes. LRP-1 blockade did not significantly affect the levels of beta 1-integrin-containing lysosomes while decreasing localization of beta 1-integrin within Rab-11 positive vesicles. Overall, we identified an original molecular process in which LRP-1 acts as a main regulator of beta 1-integrin internalization and recycling in thyroid cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据