4.3 Article

Prognostic relevance of androgen receptor expression in renal cell carcinomas

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 45, 页码 78545-78555

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20827

关键词

renal cell carcinoma; kidney; androgen receptor; treatment; prognostic marker

资金

  1. Stufe I Program of the University Medical Center Mainz
  2. Mainz Research School of Translational Biomedicine (TransMed)
  3. Manfred-Stolte-Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite rapid discoveries in molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and advances in systemic targeted therapies, development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies is urgently needed. The androgen receptor (AR) has been shown to hold prognostic and predicitve value in several malignancies. Here, we studied a possible association between AR expression and prognosis in patients with RCCs. Results: Low AR expression levels were associated with occurrence of distant metastasis and higher tumor stage in papillary and clear-cell RCCs. Importantly, multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that AR is an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival. Materials and Methods: The expression of AR was measured by immunohistochemistry and assessed by digital image analysis using a tissue microarray containing tumor tissue of a large and well-documented series of RCC patients with long-term follow-up information. Chi-squared tests, Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used to investigate the possible relationship between AR expression and clinicopathological characteristics and patient survival. Conclusions: Patients affected by AR-positive tumors exhibit a favorable prognosis by multiple Cox regression, while loss of AR expression is related to aggressive disease. Therefore, assessing AR expression offers valuable prognostic information that could improve treatment selection for metastatic disease. Moreover, our findings highlight a potential therapeutic use of AR pharmaceuticals in patients with RCCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据