4.7 Article

A multilayer electro-thermal model of pouch battery during normal discharge and internal short circuit process

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 506-516

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.03.135

关键词

Lithium ion battery; Electro-thermal coupled model; Temperature distribution; Internal short circuit

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51477171, 5151101411]
  2. Guangdong Science and Technology Project for International Cooperation [2015B050501008]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [201509010018]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [2013230]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the electrical and thermal characteristic will affect the batteries' safety, performance, calendar life and capacity fading, an electro-thermal coupled model for pouch battery LiFePO4/C is developed in normal discharge and internal short circuit process. The battery is discretized into many cell elements which are united as a 2D network equivalent circuit. The electro-thermal model is solved with finite difference method. Non-uniformity of current distribution and temperature distribution is simulated and the result is validated with experiment data at various discharge rates. Comparison of the lumped model and the multilayer structure model shows that the temperature non-uniformity Phi of multilayer model is bigger than that of lumped model and shows more precise. The temperature non-uniformity is quantified and the reason of non-uniformity is analyzed. The electro-thermal model can also be used to guide the safety design of battery. The temperature of the ISC element near tabs is the highest because the equivalent resistance of the external circuit (not including the ISC element) is the smallest when the resistance of cell units is small. It is found that increasing the thermal conductivity of integrated layer can effectively relieve the heat spot effect of ISC. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据