4.6 Article

Evaluating the Potential Benefits of Metal Ion Doping in SnO2 Negative Electrodes for Lithium Ion Batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 400-407

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.029

关键词

Continuous Hydrothermal Flow Synthesis; Tin dioxide; Lithium ion battery; Anode; Nano

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/L015862/1]
  2. ELEVATE project [ELEctrochemical Vehicle Advanced Technology, EPSRC] [EP/M009394/1]
  3. A Star (Singapore)
  4. UCL
  5. EPSRC [EP/M009394/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1570039, EP/M009394/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nine different transition metal doped (< 10 at%) tin dioxides and undoped SnO2 nanopowders with similar specific surface areas were made using a continuous hydrothermal process and then investigated as potential negative electrode materials for lithium ion batteries. The as-prepared nanopowders were characterized via a range of analytical techniques including powder X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, transmission electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area measurements. Doped SnO2 materials were grouped into two classes according to the potential redox activity of the dopant ( those presumed to be redox inactive: Nb, Ti, Zr; and those presumed to be redox active: Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Mn, Ni). The role of the transition metal ion dopant on the cycling performance (overall capacity and voltage hysteresis), was elucidated for the first cycle via cyclic voltammetry measurements in half cells versus lithium metal. In particular, the authors were able to evaluate whether the initial Coulombic efficiency and the delithiation potential (vs. Li/Li+) of the doped samples, would be likely to offer any increased energy density (compared to undoped SnO2) for lithium ion batteries. (C) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据