4.3 Article

Gene regulatory pattern analysis reveals essential role of core transcriptional factors' activation in triple-negative breast cancer

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 13, 页码 21938-21953

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15749

关键词

gene regulatory pattern; network analysis; transcriptional factors; TNBC

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB553906]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype. Genome-scale molecular characteristics and regulatory mechanisms that distinguish TNBC from other subtypes remain incompletely characterized. Results: By combining gene expression analysis and PANDA network, we defined three different TF regulatory patterns. A core TNBC-Specific TF Activation Driven Pattern (TNBCac) was specifically identified in TNBC by computational analysis. The essentialness of core TFs (ZEB1, MZF1, SOX10) in TNBC was highlighted and validated by cell proliferation analysis. Furthermore, 13 out of 35 co-targeted genes were also validated to be targeted by ZEB1, MZF1 and SOX10 in TNBC cell lines by real-time quantitative PCR. In three breast cancer cohorts, non-TNBC patients could be stratified into two subgroups by the 35 co-targeted genes along with 5 TFs, and the subgroup that more resembled TNBC had a worse prognosis. Methods: We constructed gene regulatory networks in breast cancer by Passing Attributes between Networks for Data Assimilation (PANDA). Co-regulatory modules were specifically identified in TNBC by computational analysis, while the essentialness of core translational factors (TF) in TNBC was highlighted and validated by in vitro experiments. Prognostic effects of different factors were measured by Log-rank test and displayed by Kaplan-Meier plots. Conclusions: We identified a core co-regulatory module specifically existing in TNBC, which enabled subtype re-classification and provided a biologically feasible view of breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据