4.8 Article

Iron-Induced Activation of Ordered Mesoporous Nickel Cobalt Oxide Electrocatalyst for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 25, 页码 21225-21233

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b02571

关键词

ordered mesoporous oxides; nickel cobalt oxides; electrochemical water oxidation; activation; iron; cyclic voltammetry

资金

  1. MAXNET Energy consortium of the Max Planck Society
  2. Cluster of Excellence RESOLV - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [EXC 1069]
  3. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (FCI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, ordered mesoporous nickel cobalt oxides prepared by the nanocasting route are reported as highly active oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts. By using the ordered mesoporous structure as a model system and afterward elevating the optimal catalysts composition, it is shown that, with a simple electrochemical activation step, the performance of nickel cobalt oxide can be significantly enhanced. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy results indicated that charge transfer resistance increases for Co3O4 spinel after an activation process, while this value drops for NiO and,especially for CoNi mixed oxide significantly, which confirms the improvement of oxygen evolution kinetics. The catalyst with the optimal composition (Co/Ni 4/1) reaches a Current density of 10 mA/cm(2) with an overpotential of a mere 336 mV and a Tafel slope of 36 mV/dec,outperforming benchmarked and other reported Ni/Co-based OER. electrocatalysts. The catalyst also demonstrates outstanding durability for 14 h and maintained the ordered mesoporous Structure.The cyclic voltammograms along with the electrochemical measurements in Fe-free KOH electrolyte suggest that the activity boost is attributed to the generation of surface Ni(OH)(2) species that incorporate Fe impurities from the electrolyte: The incorporation of Fe into the structure is also confirmed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据