4.3 Article

Association between SOD1, CAT, GSHPX1 polymorphisms and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease in the Polish population

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 65, 页码 109332-109339

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.22675

关键词

inflammatory bowel diseases; genetic polymorphism; antioxidant enzyme activity; oxidative stress

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [2015/19/B/NZ5/01421]
  2. Medical University of Lodz [503/5-108-05/503-51-0006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The main aim of this study was investigate the association between the genetic polymorphism of antioxidant enzyme genes: SOD1, CAT and GSHPX1 and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in the Polish population. Methods: A total of 445 subjects including 200 patients with IBD and 245 controls were allowed in this study. We determined activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx1) and examination their association with the SNPs of respective genes (SOD1 + 35A/C, CAT C-262T and GSHPX1 Pro197Leu). RFLP technique was used to determine the selected genes polymorphisms. Antioxidant enzymes activity were evaluated in erythrocyte hemolysate of 23 patients with nonactive IBD and 30 healthy participants. Results: The A/C genotype and the C allele frequencies of A/C polymorphism of SOD1 gene were significantly associated with the reduced risk of IBD (OR= 0.43; 95% CI 0.23; 0.83). Alike, C/T (OR= 0.45; 95% CI= 0.29; 0.70) and T/T genotype (OR= 0.43; 95% CI= 0.21; 0.87) of GSHPX1 gene polymorphism diminished the susceptibility to IBD. A significant decrease of CAT (P= 0.028) and increase of GPx1 (P= 0.025) enzyme activities were seen in IBD patients compared to control. Conclusions: Our data confirm dysregulated antioxidant capacity in patients suffering from IBD. Both, the SOD1 A/C genotype as well as GSHPX1 C/T and T/T genotypes may be associated with a reduction risk of IBD in the Polish population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据