4.7 Article

Modeling the water budget of the Upper Blue Nile basin using the JGrass-NewAge model system and satellite data

期刊

HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 3145-3165

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/hess-21-3145-2017

关键词

-

资金

  1. CLIMAWARE projects of University of Trento
  2. European Union [603629-ENV-2013.6.2.1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Upper Blue Nile basin is one of the most data-scarce regions in developing countries, and hence the hydrological information required for informed decision making in water resource management is limited. The hydrological complexity of the basin, tied with the lack of hydrometeorological data, means that most hydrological studies in the region are either restricted to small subbasins where there are relatively better hydrometeorological data available, or on the whole-basin scale but at very coarse timescales and spatial resolutions. In this study we develop a methodology that can improve the state of the art by using available, but sparse, hydrometeorological data and satellite products to obtain the estimates of all the components of the hydrological cycle (precipitation, evapotranspiration, discharge, and storage). To obtain the water-budget closure, we use the JGrass-NewAge system and various remote sensing products. The satellite product SM2R-CCI is used for obtaining the rainfall inputs, SAF EUMETSAT for cloud cover fraction for proper net radiation estimation, GLEAM for comparison with NewAge-estimated evapotranspiration, and GRACE gravimetry data for comparison of the total water storage amounts available in the whole basin. Results are obtained at daily time steps for the period 1994-2009 (16 years), and they can be used as a reference for any water resource development activities in the region. The overall water-budget analysis shows that precipitation of the basin is 1360 +/- 230mm per year. Evapotranspiration accounts for 56% of the annual water budget, runoff is 33 %, storage varies from -10 to + 17% of the water budget.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据