4.7 Article

In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of ZTI-01 (Fosfomycin for Injection) in the Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00476-17

关键词

fosfomycin; PK/PD

资金

  1. Zavante

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fosfomycin is a broad-spectrum agent with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including drug-resistant strains, such as extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative rods. In the present study, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) activity of ZTI-01 (fosfomycin for injection) was evaluated in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model against 5 Escherichia coli, 3 Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 2 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, including a subset with ESBL and CR phenotypes. The pharmacokinetics of ZTI-01 were examined in mice after subcutaneous administration of 3.125, 12.5, 50, 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg of body weight. The half-life ranged from 0.51 to 1.1 h, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) ranged from 1.4 to 87 mg . h/liter, and maximum concentrations ranged from 0.6 to 42.4 mg/liter. Dose fractionation demonstrated the AUC/MIC ratio to be the PK/PD index most closely linked to efficacy (R-2 = 0.70). Net stasis and bactericidal activity were observed against all strains. Net stasis was observed at 24-h AUC/MIC ratio values of 24, 21, and 15 for E. coli, K., pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, respectively. For the Enterobacteriaceae group, stasis was noted at mean 24-h AUC/MIC ratio targets of 23 and 1-log kill at 83. Survival in mice infected with E. coli 145 was maximal at 24-h AUC/MIC ratio exposures of 9 to 43, which is comparable to the stasis exposures identified in the PK/PD studies. These results should prove useful for the design of clinical dosing regimens for ZTI-01 in the treatment of serious infections due to Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据