4.3 Article

Factors screening to statistical experimental design of racemic atenolol kinetic resolution via transesterification reaction in organic solvent using free Pseudomonas fluorescens lipase

期刊

CHIRALITY
卷 29, 期 7, 页码 376-385

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/chir.22702

关键词

central composite design; enzymatic transesterification; kinetic resolution; Pseudomonas fluorescens lipase; racemic atenolol

资金

  1. Universiti Sains Malaysia (PRGS) [1001/PJKIMIA/8044030]
  2. MOSTI (Science Fund) [305/227/PJKIMIA/6013337]
  3. MTDC [304/PJKIMIA/6053010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the (R)-enantiomer of racemic atenolol has no beta-blocking activity and no lack of side effects, switching from the racemate to the (S)-atenolol is more favorable. Transesterification of racemic atenolol using free enzymes investigated as a resource to resolve the racemate via this method is limited. Screenings of enzyme, medium, and acetyl donor were conducted first to give Pseudomonas fluorescens lipase, tetrahydrofuran, and vinyl acetate. A statistical design of the experiment was then developed using Central Composite Design on some operational factors, which resulted in the conversions of 11.70-61.91% and substrate enantiomeric excess (ee) of 7.31-100%. The quadratic models are acceptable with R-2 of 95.13% (conversion) and 89.63% (ee). The predicted values match the observed values reasonably well. Temperature, agitation speed, and substrate molar ratio factor have low effects on conversion and ee, but enzyme loading affects the responses highly. The interaction of temperature-agitation speed and temperature-substrate molar ratio show significant effects on conversion, while temperature-agitation speed, temperature-substrate molar ratio, and agitation speed-substrate molar ratio affect ee highly. Optimum conditions for the use of Pseudomonas fluorescens lipase, tetrahydrofuran, and vinyl acetate were found at 45 degrees C, 175 rpm, 2000 U, and 1:3.6 substrate molar ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据