4.6 Article

A 5-Year Observational Study of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation or Treatment as Usual: Comparison of Response, Remission, and Suicidality

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 174, 期 7, 页码 640-648

出版社

AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16010034

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cyberonics, Inc.
  2. Neuronetics
  3. Dalio Foundation
  4. Stanley Medical Research Institute
  5. August Busch IV Foundation
  6. Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation
  7. Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  9. NeoSync
  10. NIMH
  11. Sidney R. Baer, Jr., Foundation
  12. Stanley Foundation
  13. Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research
  14. Washington University Center for Brain Research in Mood Disorders
  15. Cyberonics
  16. Eli Lilly
  17. Forest Laboratories
  18. Medtronic
  19. Roche
  20. Actavis
  21. Alkermes
  22. AstraZeneca
  23. EIMindA
  24. Cheryl T. Herman Foundation
  25. Hoffman-La Roche
  26. Janssen
  27. Naurex
  28. Otsuka
  29. NIH
  30. Shire
  31. Takeda

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The Treatment-Resistant Depression Registry investigated whether adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with treatment as usual in depression has superior long-term outcomes compared with treatment as usual only. Method: This 5-year, prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, observational registry study was conducted at 61 U.S. sites and included 795 patients who were experiencing a major depressive episode (unipolar or bipolar depression) of at least 2 years' duration or had three or more depressive episodes (including the current episode), and who had failed four or more depression treatments (including ECT). Patients with a history of psychosis or rapid-cycling bipolar disorder were excluded. The primary efficacy measure was response rate, defined as a decrease of >= 50% in baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score at any post-baseline visit during the 5-year study. Secondary efficacy measures included remission. Results: Patients had chronic moderate to severe depression at baseline (the mean MADRS score was 29.3 [SD=6.9] for the treatment-as-usual group and 33.1 [SD=7.0] for the adjunctive VNS group). The registry results indicate that the adjunctive VNS group had better clinical outcomes than the treatment-as-usual group, including a significantly higher 5-year cumulative response rate (67.6% compared with 40.9%) and a significantly higher remission rate (cumulative first-time remitters, 43.3% compared with 25.7%). A subanalysis demonstrated that among patients with a history of response to ECT, those in the adjunctive VNS group had a significantly higher 5-year cumulative response rate than those in the treatment-as-usual group (71.3% compared with 56.9%). A similar significant response differential was observed among ECT nonresponders (59.6% compared with 34.1%). Conclusions: This registry represents the longest and largest naturalistic study of efficacy outcomes in treatment-resistant depression, and it provides additional evidence that adjunctive VNS has enhanced antidepressant effects compared with treatment as usual in this severely ill patient population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据