4.7 Article

Phosphorylated Neurofilament Heavy Chain: A Biomarker of Survival for C9ORF72-Associated Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

期刊

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
卷 82, 期 1, 页码 139-146

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.24980

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH National Institute on Aging [P01AG017586, K23AG042856, P30AG10124]
  2. NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) [R21NS089979, R01NS078398, R35NS097273, R21NS084528, P01NS084974, R01NS088689, R01NS093865]
  3. NIH NINDS [Z01NS0 03146]
  4. Department of Defense Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research Program [AL130125]
  5. Mayo Clinic Foundation
  6. Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine
  7. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association
  8. Robert Packard Center for ALS Research at Johns Hopkins
  9. Target ALS
  10. Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration
  11. ALS Therapy Alliance
  12. ALS Finding a Cure Foundation
  13. Muscular Dystrophy Association [416137, 4365, 172123]
  14. Italian Ministry of Health [RF-2013-02355764]
  15. STRENGTH project - EU Joint Program-Neurodegenerative
  16. CReATe part of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network, an initiative of the Office of Rare Diseases Research, National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences (NCATS) [U54-NS092091]
  17. NCATS
  18. NINDS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As potential treatments for C9ORF72-associated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (c9ALS) approach clinical trials, the identification of prognostic biomarkers for c9ALS becomes a priority. We show that levels of phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (pNFH) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) predict disease status and survival in c9ALS patients, and are largely stable over time. Moreover, c9ALS patients exhibit higher pNFH levels, more rapid disease progression, and shorter survival after disease onset than ALS patients without C9ORF72 expansions. These data support the use of CSF pNFH as a prognostic biomarker for clinical trials, which will increase the likelihood of successfully developing a treatment for c9ALS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据