4.3 Article

Catalpol protects synaptic proteins from beta-amyloid induced neuron injury and improves cognitive functions in aged rats

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 41, 页码 69303-69315

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17951

关键词

catalpol; synaptic proteins; neuron injury; cognitive functions; Alzheimer's disease; Gerotarget

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [30873056, 81573401]
  2. Baylor Scott White Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synapse loss is one of the common factors contributing to cognitive disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), which is manifested by the impairment of basic cognitive functions including memory processing, perception, problem solving, and language. The current therapies for patients with cognitive disorders are mainly palliative; thus, regimens preventing and/or delaying dementia progression are urgently needed. In this study, we evaluated the effects of catalpol, isolated from traditional Chinese medicine Rehmannia glutinosa, on synaptic plasticity in aged rat models. We found that catalpol markedly improved the cognitive function of aged male Sprague-Dawley rats and simultaneously increased the expression of synaptic proteins (dynamin 1, PSD-95, and synaptophysin) in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus, respectively. In beta-amyloid (A beta) injured primary rat's cortical neuron, catalpol did not increase the viability of neuron but extended the length of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2) positive neurites and reversed the suppressive effects on expression of synaptic proteins induced by A beta. Additionally, the effects of catalpol on stimulating the growth of MAP-2 positive neurites and the expression of synaptic proteins were diminished by a PKC inhibitor, bisindolylmaleimide I, suggesting that PKC may be implicated in catalpol's function of preventing the neurodegeneration induced by A beta. Altogether, our study indicates that catalpol could be a potential disease-modifying drug for cognitive disorders such as AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据