4.3 Article

Level of FACT defines the transcriptional landscape and aggressive phenotype of breast cancer cells

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 13, 页码 20525-20542

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15656

关键词

FACT; SSRP1; SPT16; curaxin CBL0137; breast cancer

资金

  1. Incuron
  2. Komen Foundation [CCR13264604]
  3. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R01CA197967]
  4. NCI grant [P30CA016056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although breast cancer (BrCa) may be detected at an early stage, there is a shortage of markers that predict tumor aggressiveness and a lack of targeted therapies. Histone chaperone FACT, expressed in a limited number of normal cells, is overexpressed in different types of cancer, including BrCa. Recently, we found that FACT expression in BrCa correlates with markers of aggressive BrCa, which prompted us to explore the consequences of FACT inhibition in BrCa cells with varying levels of FACT. FACT inhibition using a small molecule or shRNA caused reduced growth and viability of all BrCa cells tested. Phenotypic changes were more severe in high-FACT cells (death or growth arrest) than in low-FACT cells (decreased proliferation). Though inhibition had no effect on the rate of general transcription, expression of individual genes was changed in a cell-specific manner. Initially distinct transcriptional profiles of BrCa cells became similar upon equalizing FACT expression. In high-FACT cells, FACT supports expression of genes involved in the regulation of cell cycle, DNA replication, maintenance of an undifferentiated cell state and regulated by the activity of several proto-oncogenes. In low-FACT cells, the presence of FACT reduces expression of genes encoding enzymes of steroid metabolism that are characteristic of differentiated mammary epithelia. Thus, we propose that FACT is both a marker and a target of aggressive BrCa cells, whose inhibition results in the death of BrCa or convertion of them to a less aggressive subtype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据