4.6 Review

Interindividual Variability in Biomarkers of Cardiometabolic Health after Consumption of Major Plant-Food Bioactive Compounds and the Determinants Involved

期刊

ADVANCES IN NUTRITION
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 558-570

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3945/an.116.013623

关键词

plant-food bioactives; interindividual variability; cardiometabolic health; determinants of interindividual variability; biological responsiveness

资金

  1. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)
  2. BBSRC [BBS/E/F/00044434] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/F/00044434] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiometabolic disease, comprising cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and their associated risk factors including metabolic syndrome and obesity, is the leading cause of death worldwide. Plant foods are rich sources of different groups of bioactive compounds, which might not be essential throughout life but promote health and well-being by reducing the risk of age-related chronic diseases. However, heterogeneity in the responsiveness to bioactive compounds can obscure associations between their intakes and health outcomes, resulting in the hiding of health benefits for specific population groups and thereby limiting our knowledge of the exact role of the different bioactive compounds for health. The heterogeneity in response suggests that some individuals may benefit more than others from the health effects of these bioactive compounds. However, to date, this interindividual variation after habitual intake of plant bioactive compounds has been little explored. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the existing research that has revealed interindividual variability in the responsiveness to plant-food bioactive compound consumption regarding cardiometabolic outcomes, focusing on polyphenols, caffeine and plant sterols, and the identified potential determinants involved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据