4.7 Article

Biopore history determines the microbial community composition in subsoil hotspots

期刊

BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS
卷 53, 期 5, 页码 573-588

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-017-1201-5

关键词

Amino sugars; Biomarkers; Carbon sequestration; Carbon turnover; Detritusphere; Drilosphere; Phospholipid fatty acids

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG KU 1184/29-1, INST 186/1006-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biopores are hotspots of nutrient mobilisation and shortcuts for carbon (C) into subsoils. C processing relies on microbial community composition, which remains unexplored in subsoil biopores. Phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs; markers for living microbial groups) and amino sugars (microbial necromass markers) were extracted from two subsoil depths (45-75 cm ; 75-105 cm) and three biopore types: (I) drilosphere of Lumbricus terrestris L., (II) 2-year-old root biopores and (III) 1.5-year-old root biopores plus six 6 months of L. terrestris activities. Biopore C contents were at least 2.5 times higher than in bulk soil, causing 26-35 times higher I pound PLFAs g(-1) soil. The highest I pound PLFAs were found in both earthworm biopore types; thus, the highest soil organic matter and nutrient turnover were assumed. I pound PLFAs was 33% lower in root pores than in earthworm pores. The treatment affected the microbial community composition more strongly than soil depth, hinting to similar C quality in biopores: Gram-positives including actinobacteria were more abundant in root pores than in earthworm pores, probably due to lower C bioavailability in the former. Both earthworm pore types featured fresh litter input, promoting growth of Gram-negatives and fungi. Earthworms in root pores shifted the composition of the microbial community heavily and turned root pores into earthworm pores within 6 months. Only recent communities were affected and they reflect a strong heterogeneity of microbial activity and functions in subsoil hotspots, whereas biopore-specific necromass accumulation from different microbial groups was absent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据