4.5 Article

Frequent inoculations with radiation attenuated sporozoite is essential for inducing sterile protection that correlates with a threshold level of Plasmodia liver-stage specific CD8+ T cells

期刊

CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 317, 期 -, 页码 48-54

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2017.05.001

关键词

Sterile protection; IFN-gamma(+) CD8(+) T cells; Radiation attenuated sporozoites; Parasite exposure; Liver-stage malaria infection; Multifunctional CD8(+) T cells

资金

  1. DBT, Govt. of India, New Delhi [BT/PR3130/MED/12/519/2011]
  2. DST, Govt. of India, New Delhi [EMR/2014/000535]
  3. GSBTM, Govt. of Gujarat [GSBTM/MD/PROJECTS/SSA/2243]
  4. GUJCOST, Govt. of Gujarat [GUJCOST/MRP/2014-15/1629]
  5. Nirma University
  6. ICMR, Govt. of India
  7. DBT, Govt. of India
  8. UGC, Govt. of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whole sporozoite vaccine (WSV) is shown to induce sterile protection that targets Plasmodium liver-stage infection. There are many underlying issues associated with induction of effective sterile protracted protection. In this study, we have addressed how the alterations in successive vaccine regimen could possibly affect the induction of sterile protection. We have demonstrated that the pattern of vaccination with RAS (radiation attenuated sporozoites) induces varying degrees of protection among B6 mice. Animals receiving four successive doses generated 100% sterile protection. However, three successive doses, though with the same parasite inoculum as four doses, could induce sterile protection in similar to 50% mice. Interestingly, mice immunized with the same 3 doses, but with longer gap, could not survive the challenge. We demonstrate that degree of protection correlates with the frequencies of IFN-gamma(+) and multifunctional (IFN-gamma(+) CD107a(+)) CD8(+) TEM cells present in liver. The failure to achieve protective threshold frequency of these cells in liver might make the host more vulnerable to parasite infection during infectious sporozoite challenge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据