4.4 Article

Longitudinal connectivity loss in a riverine network: accounting for the likelihood of upstream and downstream movement across dams

期刊

AQUATIC SCIENCES
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 573-585

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00027-017-0518-3

关键词

Longitudinal connectivity; Fish passability; Graph theory; Directional networks; Asymmetric dispersal; Riverscapes

资金

  1. European Union (DURERO Project) [C1 3913442]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disruption of longitudinal connectivity is a major concern in most of the world's rivers. Approaches based on graph theory have proven to be a suitable tool for analysing functional connectivity. However, previous applications of graph-based connectivity methods to river systems have been oversimplified in that they have treated potential barriers as binary features and rivers as symmetric networks. We here apply a network analytical approach in which (a) upstream and downstream connectivity are considered so that fish passability values across dams are asymmetrical, and (b) it is possible to consider a continuous range of passability values for every dam. We build on previous and widely used connectivity metrics (Probability of Connectivity, PC), which here are generalised and adapted toward that end. We compare the results of our approach with those that would be obtained under the more simplified assumptions of symmetric movement and of barriers as binary features. We want to prove if there are substantial differences between considering or not the asymmetry in river networks. The application of symmetrical and asymmetrical PC highlights major differences between the upstream connectivity versus the downstream connectivity. We provide our methods in a free software package so that they can be used in any other application to riverscapes. We expect to provide a better graph-based approach for the prioritisation of the removal or permeabilization of artificial obstacles as well as for the preservation of target river segments for connectivity conservation and restoration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据