4.7 Review

Exploring the human microbiome from multiple perspectives: factors altering its composition and function

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 453-478

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuw046

关键词

dysbiosis; gut; metabolomics; microbiota; microbiome; omics

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [CTQ2014-55279-R, BIO2014-54494-R, SAF 2012-31187, SAF2013-49788-EXP, SAF2015-65878-R]
  2. Leading National Research Center in Bialystok
  3. Carlos III Institute of Health [PIE14/00045, AC15/00022]
  4. Generalitat Valenciana [PrometeoII/2014/065]
  5. FEDER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our microbiota presents peculiarities and characteristics that may be altered by multiple factors. The degree and consequences of these alterations depend on the nature, strength and duration of the perturbations as well as the structure and stability of each microbiota. The aim of this review is to sketch a very broad picture of the factors commonly influencing different body sites, and which have been associated with alterations in the human microbiota in terms of composition and function. To do so, first, a graphical representation of bacterial, fungal and archaeal genera reveals possible associations among genera affected by different factors. Then, the revision of sequence-based predictions provides associations with functions that become part of the active metabolism. Finally, examination of microbial metabolite contents and fluxes reveals whether metabolic alterations are a reflection of the differences observed at the level of population structure, and in the last step, link microorganisms to functions under perturbations that differ in nature and aetiology. The utilisation of complementary technologies and methods, with a special focus on metabolomics research, is thoroughly discussed to obtain a global picture of microbiota composition and microbiome function and to convey the urgent need for the standardisation of protocols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据