4.3 Article

Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and tumor-related factors to predict microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 45, 页码 79722-79730

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19178

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; microvascular invasion; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is less invasive and has a better prognosis, but it still has a high recurrence rate. Microvascular invasion (MVI), as a poor prognostic indicator, is of great importance for treating of patients with HCC. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio and possible clinical parameters to MVI in patients with HCC. A total of 157 operable patients with HCC having a tumor diameter of less than or equal to 5 cm were enrolled in this study. The utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, plateletto- lymphocyte ratio, and other clinical parameters was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. MVI was identified as an independent influencing factor for disease-free survival in patients with HCC who underwent curative resection, using the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. The independent parameters associated with MVI were determined using logistic analysis. Multivariate analyses indicated that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [hazard ratio, 1.705; 95% confidence interval, 0.467-6.232; P = 0.022)], platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio, 1.048; 95% confidence interval, 1.006-1.092; P = 0.025), and a-fetoprotein (hazard ratio, 1.012; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.021; P = 0.007) were significantly associated with MVI independently. Therefore, this study concluded that the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and a-fetoprotein might serve as useful biomarkers for predicting MVI in patients with HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据