4.7 Article

Glucose decorated gold nanoclusters: A membrane potential independent fluorescence probe for rapid identification of cancer cells expressing Glut receptors

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 25-34

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.03.052

关键词

Targeted delivery; Cellular uptake; Membrane potential; Hyperpolarization; Cancer imaging

资金

  1. Gujarat Institute of Chemical Technology (GICT) [ILS/GICT/2013/003]
  2. Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Madras [TTR1314010IITMTPRA]
  3. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) [ILS/SERB/2015-16/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effective nanomedicines require nanoparticles to attach or adhere to the cell surface, which is dictated by several parameters of nanoparticles such as shape, size, charge, and composition. However, these parameters lead to the membrane potential dependent non-specific delivery of therapeutic or imaging nanosystems into cancer cells. This leads to significant complications and results into the serious impediment to effective treatment of cancer. Cancer cells are known to metabolize high amount of glucose in order to support their rapid proliferation and expansion. Recently, gold nanoclusters (AuNCs) have emerged as an excellent fluorescent nanoprobe for bio-imaging and related applications in cancer treatment. Therefore, taking cues from these studies, we have developed two types of gold nanoclusters, BSA-coated (BSA-AuNCs) and glucose coated gold nanoclusters (Glu-AuNCs) and investigated their mechanism of internalization in cell culture model systems of cancerous and noncancerous cells. Our study demonstrates that Glu-AuNCs are not internalized by HaCaT cells but selectively taken up by A431 cells through Glut-1 receptors, but their uptake was cell membrane potential independent. However, BSA-AuNCs showed more internalization in A431 than HaCaT cells, but their uptake was cell membrane potential dependent. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据