4.2 Article

Hydrogeochemical assessment of surface and groundwater resources of Korba coalfield, Central India: environmental implications

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
卷 10, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-017-3098-6

关键词

Groundwater; Coal mining; Mine hydrogeology; Water quality index; Environmental impact; Hydrogeochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study assesses the impact of coal mining on surface and groundwater resources of Korba Coalfield, Central India. Accordingly, water samples collected from various sources are analyzed for major ions, trace elements, and other mine effluent parameters. Results show that the groundwater samples are slightly acidic, whereas river water and mine water samples are mildly alkaline. Elevated concentrations of Ca2+, Na+, HCO3-, and SO42- alongside the molar ratios (Ca2+ + Mg2+)/(SO4 (2-)+ HCO3-) < 1 and Na+/Cl- > 1 suggest that silicate weathering (water-rock interaction) coupled with ion exchange are dominant solute acquisition processes controlling the chemistry of groundwater in the study area. The overall hydrogeochemistry of the area is dominated by two major hydrogeochemical facies (i. e., Ca-Cl-SO4 and Ca-HCO3). Analysis of groundwater and river water quality index (GRWQI) elucidates that majority (82%) of samples are of excellent to good category, and the remaining 12% are of poor quality. Similarly, the effluent water quality index (EWQI) indicates that 6 out of 8 samples belong to excellent quality. Concentration of trace element constituents such as As, Zn, Cu, Cr, and Cd is found to be well within the stipulated limits for potable use, except for Fe, Mn, and Pb. Suitability of water samples for irrigation purpose, established using standard tools like Wilcox and USSL diagrams, reveal excellent to permissible category for majority of the samples. The present study also substantiates the effectiveness of the measures implemented for the treatment of mine effluent water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据