4.3 Article

Lin28B facilitates the progression and metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

期刊

ONCOTARGET
卷 8, 期 36, 页码 60414-60428

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19578

关键词

lin28B; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; prognosis; therapeutic target; EMT

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1308600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672382, 81602454, 81502550]
  3. Clinical Research Foundation of TMMU [SWH2015LC01]
  4. Youth Innovation Foundation of TMMU [SWH2015QN01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lin28B, a Lin28 homologue, represses the biogenesis of let-7 microRNAs (miRNAs), has a role in tumorigenesis, and is considered a potential therapeutic target for various human malignancies. However, the associations between Lin28B and the clinical features and outcomes of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain unclear. In this study, we explored the clinical significance of Lin28B in PDAC and its association with metastasis by examining tissues from patients with PDAC and elucidated the molecular mechanisms using PDAC cell lines. In patients, high Lin28B expression was significantly correlated with high levels of lymphatic metastasis, distant metastasis and a poor prognosis. Furthermore, the multivariate analysis identified Lin28B expression as an independent prognostic factor in patients. In cell lines, stable silencing of Lin28B inhibited cell proliferation, cell cycle transition, migration and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). It also increased the expression of the c-MYC, HMGA2 and KRAS genes, which are targeted by the cancer-suppressor miRNA let-7. Lin28B overexpression in the PDAC cell lines had the opposite effect. In human PDAC samples, high Lin28B expression was associated with decreased let-7 expression and increased c-MYC, HMGA2 and KRAS expression. Thus, Lin28B is a novel marker for predicting the prognosis of patients with PDAC and might be a potential therapeutic target for PDAC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据