4.4 Article

Influence of antibiotic use in early childhood on asthma and allergic diseases at age 5

期刊

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
卷 119, 期 1, 页码 54-58

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.05.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health and Labour Sciences Research grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan [09158522]
  2. National Center for Child Health and Development [20A-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In the past few decades, the prevalence of allergic diseases has increased rapidly worldwide. At the same time, the overuse of antibiotics has been observed, especially in Japan. Objective: To elucidate the association of early childhood antibiotic use with allergic diseases in later childhood at 5 years of age. Methods: Relevant data were extracted from the hospital-based birth cohort study, the Tokyo Children's Health, Illness and Development Study. To identify signs of asthma and allergic diseases in children, the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire was used. Logistic regression models were applied to estimate the effect of antibiotic use on outcomes in later life. Results: Antibiotic exposure in children within the first 2 years of life was associated with current asthma (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.70), current atopic dermatitis (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01-1.94), and current allergic rhinitis (aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1. 05-2.58) at 5 years of age. Analysis of the associations by type of antibiotics showed that cephemwas associated with current asthma (aOR 1.97, 95% CI 1.23-3.16) and current rhinitis (aOR 1.82, 95% CI 1.12-2.93), and macrolide was associated with current atopic dermatitis (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.07-2.33). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that antibiotic use within the first 2 years of life was a risk factor for current asthma, current atopic dermatitis, and current allergic rhinitis in 5-year-old children. (C) 2017 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据