4.8 Article

Biomimetic Architectured Graphene Aerogel with Exceptional Strength and Resilience

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 6817-6824

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b01815

关键词

aerogel; biomimetic; plant stem; bidirectional freezing; mechanical performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51603182, 51603183, 21674098]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering [SKL-ChE-16T02]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017QNA4036]
  4. 1000 Youth Talents Plan of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Materials combining lightweight, robust mechanical performances, and multifunctionality are highly desirable for engineering applications. Graphene aerogels have emerged as attractive candidates. Despite recent progresses, the bottleneck remains how to simultaneously achieve both strength and resilience. While multiscale architecture designs may offer a possible route, the difficulty lies in the lack of design guidelines and how to experimentally achieve the necessary structure control over multiple length scales. The latter is even more challenging when manufacturing scalability is taken into account. The Thalia dealbata stem is a naturally porous material that is lightweight, strong, and resilient, owing to its architecture with three-dimensional (3D) interconnected lamellar layers. Inspired by such, we assemble graphene oxide (GO) sheets into a similar architecture using a bidirectional freezing technique. Subsequent freeze-drying and thermal reduction results in graphene aerogels with highly tunable 3D architectures, consequently an unusual combination of strength and resilience. With their additional electrical conductivity, these graphene aerogels are potentially useful for mechanically switchable electronics. Beyond such, our study establishes bidirectional freezing as a general method to achieve multiscale architectural control in a scalable manner that can be extended to many other material systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据