4.6 Article

Application of Galvanostatic Intermittent Titration Technique to Investigate Phase Transformation of LiFePO4 Nanoparticles

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 241, 期 -, 页码 132-140

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.137

关键词

LiFePO4 nanoparticles; phase transformation; GITT measurement; kinetics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1564205, 51472189]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013CB934000, 2014DFG71590, 2016YFE0102200]
  3. Beijing Municipal Program [YETP0157]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lithiation/delithiation of phosphate electrode materials in lithium ion batteries is often accompanied by an electrochemically driven phase transformation. The good understanding of phase transformation benefits for evaluation of SOC (state of charge) by OCV (open circuit voltage). A facile GITT (Galvanostatic Intermittent Titration Technique) is attempted to investigate the phase transformation kinetics of multiparticles LiFePO4 (LFP) nanoparticles in different depth of charge/discharge. The process of charge/discharge is divided by 20 sections, in which the cell is charged/discharged by the 5% capacity at different C-rates and then gets rest for 30 minutes. The polarization can include the kinetics of phase transformation and concentration diffusion. The detailed analysis of polarization data reflects the information of phase transformation, especially kinetics of phase transformation. Here, the result shows that the higher C-rates make quicker equilibrium of OCV in 30 minutes rest. This is consistent with the phase transformation theory as proven in this paper that the higher C-rates make the faster phase transformation. It is also displays that phase transformation is different between two ends and middle parts, and dependent on C-rates. The proposed approach paves a facile and effective way to investigate the phase transformation of phosphate electrode. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据