4.5 Review

A Review of Warm-Season Turfgrass Evapotranspiration, Responses to Deficit Irrigation, and Drought Resistance

期刊

CROP SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 S98-S110

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2016.10.0911

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Horticulture Innovation Australia
  2. Australian Research Council Linkage Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Knowledge of turfgrass evapotranspiration (ETc) and drought resistance can enable water conservation by guiding turfgrass selection for various climates and irrigation scheduling. Turfgrass ETc, crop coefficients (K-c = ETc/ET0, where ET0 is reference evapotranspiration), responses to deficit irrigation, and drought resistance, are reviewed for warm-season species (perennial, sod-forming, C-4 grasses). In well-watered conditions, ETc was 2.44 to 10.53 mm d(-1) (nine species in six climates during late spring to early autumn) and Kc was 0.34 to 1.27 (seven species in seven climates). Under deficit irrigation, ETc was 2.14 to 5.71 mm d(-1) and K-c was 0.52 to 0.94 (seven species in four climates). Crop evapotranspiration was greater with increasing aridity. The K-c data provide benchmarks for irrigation. Field irrigation doseresponse experiments show that some warmseason turfgrasses differ in water requirements. Inter-and intraspecies variations in drought resistance have also been documented. Additional research is required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed variations in turfgrass ETc and drought resistance and to test the influence of management practices (e.g., cutting height, nitrogen fertilizer, and growth regulators) in field situations. Looking forward, process-based modeling could increase understanding of turfgrass traits and other factors influencing ETc and drought resistance and further assist efficient use of water in warmseason turfgrass systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据