4.5 Article

Secondary Sphere Hydrogen Bonding in Monocopper Complexes of Potentially Dinucleating Bis(carboxamide) Ligands

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 36, 页码 5856-5863

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201501060

关键词

Copper; Hydrogen bonds; Redox chemistry; Macrocycles

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM47365]
  2. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reaction of a macrocyclic ligand precursor comprising two bis( carboxamido) pyridine units ( H4L4) connected by ethylene linkers with NMe4OH and CuX2 ( X = Cl, OAc, or OTf) yielded monocopper complexes [ NMe4][( H2L4) Cu( X)] [ X = Cl ( 3), OAc ( 4), or OH ( 5)], in contrast to the results of previous work on a related ligand with ortho- phenylene linkers wherein dicopper compounds were isolated. X- ray structures of the complexes revealed hydrogen bonding from the free carboxamide N- H groups in the doubly protonated form of the ligand ( H2L42-) to the monodentate fourth ligand coordinated to the CuII ion. Similar secondary sphere hydrogen bonding interactions were identified in multinuclear compounds [ NMe4] 2[{( H2L4) Cu} n( CO3)] ( n = 2 or 3) that were isolated from exposure of 5 to air. Cyclic voltammetry revealed oxidations of 3 and 5 at potentials about 300 mV higher than those of analogous monocopper complexes of bis( arylcarboxamido) pyridine ligands, which lack the intramolecular hydrogen bonds, consistent with removal of electron density from the metal center by the hydrogen bonding array. Another ligand variant ( H4L5) with ortho- phenylene linkers and only one bis( carboxamido) pyridine moiety yielded monocopper complexes [ NMe4][( H2L5) Cu( OAc)] center dot DMF ( 8) and [ NMe4][( H2L(5)) CuCl] center dot CH3CN ( 9), but the X- ray structures revealed a different hydrogen bonding arrangement to the solvate molecules. Nonetheless, a high redox potential for 9 was observed, consistent with intramolecular hydrogen bonding interactions in solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据