4.8 Article

Phosphorylation of Pkp1 by RIPK4 regulates epidermal differentiation and skin tumorigenesis

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 36, 期 13, 页码 1963-1980

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201695679

关键词

differentiation; epidermal progenitor cell; skin; tumorigenesis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-AR063630, AA021434, AA020265]
  2. Research Scholar Grant from the American Cancer Society [RSG-13-198-01]
  3. V scholar award from V Foundation
  4. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CBA02004]
  5. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [15410723100]
  6. University of Chicago molecular and cellular biology training grant [T32, GM007183]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue homeostasis of skin is sustained by epidermal progenitor cells localized within the basal layer of the skin epithelium. Posttranslational modification of the proteome, such as protein phosphorylation, plays a fundamental role in the regulation of stemness and differentiation of somatic stem cells. However, it remains unclear how phosphoproteomic changes occur and contribute to epidermal differentiation. In this study, we survey the epidermal cell differentiation in a systematic manner by combining quantitative phosphoproteomics with mammalian kinome cDNA library screen. This approach identified a key signaling event, phosphorylation of a desmosome component, PKP1 (plakophilin-1) by RIPK4 (receptor-interacting serine-threonine kinase 4) during epidermal differentiation. With genome-editing and mouse genetics approach, we show that loss of function of either Pkp1 or Ripk4 impairs skin differentiation and enhances epidermal carcinogenesis in vivo. Phosphorylation of PKP1's N-terminal domain by RIPK4 is essential for their role in epidermal differentiation. Taken together, our study presents a global view of phosphoproteomic changes that occur during epidermal differentiation, and identifies RIPK-PKP1 signaling as novel axis involved in skin stratification and tumorigenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据