4.4 Article

The Implications of Eco-Evolutionary Processes for the Emergence of Marine Plankton Community Biogeography

期刊

AMERICAN NATURALIST
卷 190, 期 1, 页码 116-130

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/692067

关键词

plankton biogeography; adaptive dynamics; predator-prey coevolution; evolutionary branching; food webs; metacommunities

资金

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR-10-BLAN-1709 PHYTBACK]
  2. French Government Investissements d'Avenir program MEMO LIFE [ANR-10-LABX-54]
  3. French Government Investissements d'Avenir program PSL Research University [ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Award Diatomite
  5. Louis D Foundation
  6. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Models of community assembly have been used to illustrate how the many functionally diverse species that compose plankton food webs can coexist. However, the evolutionary processes leading to the emergence of plankton food webs and their interplay with migratory processes and spatial heterogeneity are yet to be explored. We study the eco-evolutionary dynamics of a modeled plankton community structured in both size and space and physiologically constrained by empirical data. We demonstrate that a complex yet ecologically and evolutionarily stable size-structured food web can emerge from an initial set of two monomorphic phytoplankton and zooplankton populations. We also show that the coupling of spatial heterogeneity and migration results in the emergence of specific biogeographic patterns: (i) the emergence of a source-sink structure of the plankton metacommunities, (ii) changes in size diversity dependent on migratory intensity and on the scale at which diversity is considered (local vs. global), and (iii) the emergence of eco-evolutionary provinces (i.e., a spatial unit characterized by some level of abiotic heterogeneity but of homogenous size composition due to horizontal movements) at spatial scales that increase with the strength of the migratory processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据