4.7 Article

Dietary treatment of fatty liver: High dietary protein content has an antisteatotic and antiobesogenic effect in mice

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.04.022

关键词

High-protein diet; FGF21; PCK1; NF kappa B; Sex differences; Fatty acid synthesis

资金

  1. TIFN grant [A-0012]
  2. research school NUTRIM
  3. Institute for Education of Maastricht University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few studies have assessed the effect of changing ratios of dietary macronutrients on fat accumulation in adipose tissue and organs such as the liver in a 3 x n(n >= 3) factorial design. We investigated the effects of 7 diets from a single manufacturer containing 11-58 en% protein (casein), 0-81 en% carbohydrates (CHO; sucrose, maltro-dextrin-10 and corn starch), and 8-42 en% fat (triheptanoin, olive oil or cocoa butter) in C57BL/6 J mice, a good model for diet-induced obesity and fatty liver. The diets were fed for 3 weeks to wild-type and hyperlipidemic male and female mice. Caloric intake was mainly determined by dietary fat. Body weight, liver lipid and cholesterol content, NF kappa B activation, and fat-pad size decreased only in mice fed a high-protein diet. A high dietary protein:CHO ratio reduced plasma FGF21 concentration, and increased liver PCK1 protein content and plasma triglyceride concentration. The dietary protein:CHO ratio determined hepatic expression of Pckl and Ppargcl a in males, and Fgf21 in females, whereas the dietary CHO:fat ratio determined that of Fasn, Acacal, and Scdl in females. Hepatic glycogen content was determined by all three dietary components. Both hepatic PCK1 and plasma FGF21 correlated strongly and inversely with hepatic TG content, suggesting a key role for PCK1 and increased gluconeogenesis in resolving steatosis with a high-protein diet, with FGF21 expression reflecting declining cell stress. We propose that a diet containing similar to 35 en% protein, 5-10 en% fat, and 55-60 en% carbohydrate will prevent fatty liver in mice without inducing side effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据