4.5 Article

IL-33 promotes innate IFN-γ production and modulates dendritic cell response in LCMV-induced hepatitis in mice

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 45, 期 11, 页码 3052-3063

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201545696

关键词

gamma delta T cell; Dendritic cell; IFN-gamma; IL-33; Innate lymphoid cell; LCMV; Viral hepatitis

资金

  1. NIH [AI109100]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20141105, GW20143]
  3. Jiangsu Government Scholarship for Overseas Studies [JS-2012-130]
  4. NIAID T35 training grant [AI078878]
  5. Stjepcevich Scholarship from the UTMB School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have revealed IL-33 as a key factor in promoting antiviral T-cell responses. However, it is less clear as to how IL-33 regulates innate immunity. In this study, we infected wild-type (WT) and IL-33(-/-) mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus and demonstrated an essential role of infection-induced IL-33 expression for robust innate IFN-gamma production in the liver. We first show that IL-33 deficiency resulted in a marked reduction in the number of IFN-gamma(+) gamma delta T and NK cells, but an increase in that of IL-17+ gamma delta T cells at 16 h postinfection. Recombinant IL-33 (rIL-33) treatment could reverse such deficiency via increasing IFN-gamma-producing gamma delta T and NK cells, and inhibiting IL-17+ gamma delta T cells. We also found that rIL-33-induced type 2 innate lymphoid cells were not involved in T-cell responses and liver injury, since the adoptive transfer of type 2 innate lymphoid cells neither affected the IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha production in T cells, nor liver transferase levels in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infected mice. Interestingly, we found that while IL-33 was not required for costimulatory molecule expression, it was critical for DC proliferation and cytokine production. Together, this study highlights an essential role of IL-33 in regulating innate IFN-gamma-production and DC function during viral hepatitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据