4.7 Article

Ambient temperature and genotype differentially affect developmental and phenotypic plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

BMC PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-017-1068-5

关键词

Arabidopsis; Natural variation; Phenotypic plasticity; Thermomorphogenesis; Phenotyping

资金

  1. Leibniz Association
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Qu 141/3-1]
  3. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FZT 118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Global increase in ambient temperatures constitute a significant challenge to wild and cultivated plant species. Forward genetic analyses of individual temperature-responsive traits have resulted in the identification of several signaling and response components. However, a comprehensive knowledge about temperature sensitivity of different developmental stages and the contribution of natural variation is still scarce and fragmented at best. Results: Here, we systematically analyze thermomorphogenesis throughout a complete life cycle in ten natural Arabidopsis thaliana accessions grown under long day conditions in four different temperatures ranging from 16 to 28 degrees C. We used Q10, GxE, phenotypic divergence and correlation analyses to assess temperature sensitivity and genotype effects of more than 30 morphometric and developmental traits representing five phenotype classes. We found that genotype and temperature differentially affected plant growth and development with variing strengths. Furthermore, overall correlations among phenotypic temperature responses was relatively low which seems to be caused by differential capacities for temperature adaptations of individual accessions. Conclusion: Genotype-specific temperature responses may be attractive targets for future forward genetic approaches and accession-specific thermomorphogenesis maps may aid the assessment of functional relevance of known and novel regulatory components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据