4.7 Article

Unique NSGA-II and MOPSO algorithms for improved dynamic cellular manufacturing systems considering human factors

期刊

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 655-672

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.02.026

关键词

Decision-making style; Dynamic cellular manufacturing system; Human reliability; Labor assignment; Machine failure; Multi-objective optimization

资金

  1. University of Tehran [8106013/1/17]
  2. College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran
  3. French Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  4. embassy of France in Iran [889461B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we present a new mathematical model of a multi-objective dynamic cellular manufacturing system (MDCMS) that considers human factors. Human factors are incorporated into the proposed model in terms of human reliability and decision-making processes. Three objective functions are considered simultaneously. The first objective minimizes the total cost of the MDCMS. The second objective function minimizes inconsistency in the decision-making style of operators in the common manufacturing cells. The third objective function balances the workload of cells with respect to the efficiency of operators, which is calculated based on human reliability analysis. Various studies have been conducted in the field of MDCMS, but human factors have not received sufficient attention as important elements. Due to the NP-hardness of the MDCMS problem, two innovative meta-heuristic algorithms are developed, i.e., a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) and a multi-objective particle swarm optimization method. The results obtained by the algorithms were compared and analyzed using different criteria. Several test problems were considered to verify and validate the proposed model and solution methods. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to consider human reliability and decision-making styles in a large MDCMS in an actual production setting. (C)2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据