4.7 Article

Evaluation of the toxicity of herbicide topramezone to Chlorella vulgaris: Oxidative stress, cell morphology and photosynthetic activity

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 129-135

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.05.022

关键词

Topramezone; Flow cytometry; Oxidative stress; Cell viability; Photosynthesis

资金

  1. Project of Science and Technology in Zhejiang Food and Drug Administration [SP201717]
  2. Key Innovation Team of Science and Technology in Zhejiang Province [2010R50018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topramezone is a new, highly selective herbicide of pyrazole structure for the post-emergence control of broadleaf and grass weeds in corn. In this study, the effects of topramezone on C. vulgaris, especially in relation to the cell growth, oxidative stress, cell morphology and photosynthetic activity were assessed. Results showed that topramezone treatment was detrimental to C. vulgaris growth during the 24-96 h of exposure. The changes in cells pigments content and relative transcript of photosynthesis-related genes, which implies that topramezone disrupted the photosynthetic system. Moreover, topramezone induced membrane permeability in a significant proportion of cells with a maximum damage rate of 40.40%, and morphology of cells was more complicated than the control group. TEM images also revealed that topramezone compromised the integrity of the cells. The data corroborated topramezone induced ROS triggered oxidative stress, leading to an increase of MDA. These results suggested that topramezone could have significant effects on growth and physiological functions in algae species, and we supposed that this herbicide affected all of these parameters and the observed effects can be explained by the generation of oxidative stress. This research helps to understand how topramezone affects C. vulgaris and provides a scientific basis for applications of topramezone in aquatic environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据