4.2 Article

The reliability of shear elastic modulus measurement of the ankle plantar flexion muscles is higher at dorsiflexed position of the ankle

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13047-017-0199-0

关键词

Shear-wave elastography; Shear elastic modulus; Muscle stiffness; Muscle hardness; Reliability; Tibialis posterior; Flexor digitorum longus; Flexor hallucis longus

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows [16 J11346]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16J11346] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Excessive stiffness of lower limb muscles is associated with sports injuries. Therefore, the identification of a reliable measurement of the shear elastic modulus of various ankle plantar flexion muscles is required to evaluate lower leg sports injuries. This study investigated the reliable measurement of the shear elastic modulus of the ankle plantar flexion muscles at different ankle positions. Methods: Twenty-three healthy young men (25.3 +/- 3.6 years, 172.9 +/- 5.0 cm, 67.2 +/- 7.2 kg) participated in this study. The shear elastic moduli of the ankle plantar flexion muscles including the lateral gastrocnemius, medial gastrocnemius, soleus, peroneus longus, peroneus brevis, flexor hallucis longus, flexor digitorum longus and tibialis posterior were measured using ultrasonic shear wave elastography at 0, 10 and 20 degrees dorsiflexion. Results: The reliability of the shear elastic modulus measurements for each ankle position was assessed. The results showed that the interday reliability of the measurements differed between ankle positions and that the reliability of the shear elastic modulus measurements at 20 degrees dorsiflexion was higher than that at 10 degrees or 0 degrees. Conclusion: Our results suggest that measurements at 20 degrees dorsiflexion may provide a more reliable measurement of the shear elastic modulus of ankle plantar flexion muscles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据