4.4 Article

Taming Big Data: Using App Technology to Study Organizational Behavior on Social Media

期刊

SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 189-217

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0049124115587825

关键词

computational social science; apps; social media; organizational behavior

资金

  1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation [1357223]
  3. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1357223] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Social media websites such as Facebook and Twitter provide an unprecedented amount of qualitative data about organizations and collective behavior. Yet these new data sources lack critical information about the broader social context of collective behavior-or protect it behind strict privacy barriers. In this article, I introduce social media survey apps (SMSAs) that adjoin computational social science methods with conventional survey techniques in order to enable more comprehensive analysis of collective behavior online. SMSAs (1) request large amounts of public and non-public data from organizations that maintain social media pages, (2) survey these organizations to collect additional data of interest to a researcher, and (3) return the results of a scholarly analysis back to these organizations as incentive for them to participate in social science research. SMSAs thus provide a highly efficient, cost-effective, and secure method for extracting detailed data from very large samples of organizations that use social media sites. This article describes how to design and implement SMSAs and discusses an application of this new method to study how nonprofit organizations attract public attention to their cause on Facebook. I conclude by evaluating the quality of the sample derived from this application of SMSAs and discussing the potential of this new method to study non-organizational populations on social media sites as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据