4.2 Article

Understanding and promoting treatment-seeking for eating disorders and body image concerns on college campuses through online screening, prevention and intervention

期刊

EATING BEHAVIORS
卷 25, 期 -, 页码 68-73

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.03.020

关键词

Eating disorders; College students; Prevention; Treatment-seeking

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [NIH/NIMH R01 (MH100455-01)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While there have been important recent advances in the development of effective universal prevention and intervention programs, it is not yet clear how to engage large numbers of students in these programs. In this paper, we report findings from a two-phase pilot study. In the first phase, we used a population-level, online survey to assess eating disorder symptom level and habits/attitudes related to service utilization (N = 2180). Using validated screening tools, we found that roughly one in three students has significant symptoms of eating disorders or elevated weight concerns, the vast majority of whom (86.5%) have not received treatment. In the second phase, we referred students to online prevention and selective/indicated intervention programs based on symptom classification (N = 1916). We find that program enrollment is highest for students in the indicated intervention (18.1%) and lowest for students in the universal prevention (4.1%). We find that traditionally-emphasized barriers such as stigma, misinformation, and financial limitations do not appear to be the most important factors preventing treatment-seeldng. Rather students report not seeking help for reasons such as lack of time, lack of perceived need, and a desire to deal with the issue on my own. Findings offer insight into the treatment seeking habits and attitudes of college students, including those barriers that may be overcome by offering online programs and those that persist despite increased access to and convenience of relevant resources. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据