4.4 Article

Emotional distress impacts quality of life evaluation: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 309-319

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-016-0589-5

关键词

Cancer survivors; Emotional distress; Health-related quality of life; Measurement non-invariance; Mediation analysis

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [U24 CA55727, R21 CA202210]
  2. Cancer Center Support grant [P30 CA21765]
  3. ALSAC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compared health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between adult survivors of childhood cancer and siblings by investigating the mediating role of emotional distress on HRQOL assessment, and examining the extent to which emotional distress affected the item responses of HRQOL measures given the same underlying HRQOL (i.e., measurement non-invariance). Cancer survivors (7103) and siblings (390) enrolled in Childhood Cancer Survivor Study who completed the SF-36 measuring HRQOL and the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 measuring anxiety, depression, and somatization were analyzed. Multiple Indicators & Multiple Causes modeling was performed to identify measurement non-invariance related to emotional distress on the responses to HRQOL items. Mediation analysis was performed to test the effects of cancer experience on HRQOL accounting for the mediating role of emotional distress. Twenty-nine percent, 40%, and 34% of the SF-36 items were identified with measurement non-invariance related to anxiety, depression, and somatization, respectively. Survivors reported poorer HRQOL than siblings in all domains (ps < 0.05), except for pain. Other than physical functioning and general health perceptions, poorer HRQOL was explained by the mediating role of emotional distress (ps < 0.05). Differences in HRQOL between survivors and siblings appear due, in part, to the mediating effect of emotional distress through which cancer experience influences the responses to HRQOL measures. Interventions to treat emotional distress may improve cancer survivors' HRQOL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据