4.5 Article

Pathogenic mitochondrial mt-tRNAAla variants are uniquely associated with isolated myopathy

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 1735-1738

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.73

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research
  2. Wellcome Trust [096919Z/11/Z]
  3. Medical Research Council (UK) Centre for Translational Muscle Disease Research [G0601943]
  4. Lily Foundation
  5. UK NHS Specialist Commissioners funds the 'Rare Mitochondrial Disorders of Adults and Children' Diagnostic Service in Newcastle upon Tyne
  6. Medical Research Council [G0601943, MR/K000608/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. MRC [G0601943, MR/K000608/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) point mutations are associated with a wide range of clinical phenotypes, often involving multiple organ systems. We report two patients with isolated myopathy owing to novel mt-tRNA(Ala) variants. Muscle biopsy revealed extensive histopathological findings including cytochrome c oxidase (COX)-deficient fibres. Pyrosequencing confirmed mtDNA heteroplasmy for both mutations (m.5631G>A and m.5610G>A) whilst single-muscle fibre segregation studies (revealing statistically significant higher mutation loads in COX-deficient fibres than in COX-positive fibres), hierarchical mutation segregation within patient tissues and decreased steady-state mt-tRNAAla levels all provide compelling evidence of pathogenicity. Interestingly, both patients showed very high-mutation levels in all tissues, inferring that the threshold for impairment of oxidative phosphorylation, as evidenced by COX deficiency, appears to be extremely high for these mt-tRNAAla variants. Previously described mt-tRNAAla mutations are also associated with a pure myopathic phenotype and demonstrate very high mtDNA heteroplasmy thresholds, inferring at least some genotype: phenotype correlation for mutations within this particular mt-tRNA gene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据