4.5 Article

Body composition and frailty profiles in Brazilian older people: Frailty in Brazilian Older People Study-FIBRA-BR

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 99-104

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.03.008

关键词

Frailty; Body composition; BMI; Waist circumference

资金

  1. Brazilian funding agency: Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [CNPq - 555087/2006-9]
  2. Brazilian funding agency: Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro [FAPERJ - E-26/171.489/2006]
  3. Brazilian funding agency: Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais [FAPEMIG - 572/2006-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the association between body composition and frailty in older Brazilian subjects. Material and methods: This is a Cross-sectional study called FIBRA-BR and developed in community Brazilian aged >= 65 (n = 5638). Frailty was assessed according to Fried et al. definition and body composition was determined by BMI, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio. Results: The lowest prevalence of frailty was observed in subjects with BMI between 25.0 and 29.9 kg/m(2). Subjects with a BMI <18.5 and those with elevated WC presented a higher risk of frailty compared to eutrophic subjects (odds ratio (OR) = 3.10; 95% CI: 2.06-4.67) and (OR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.27), respectively. Being overweight was protective for pre-frailty (OR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.4-0.58) and frailty (OR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.67-0.9). Obese older people presented a higher risk of pre-frailty only (OR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.09-1.51). Older people with high WC showed a greater proportion of frailty regardless of the BMI range. Conclusion: Undernutrition is associated with pre-frailty and frailty in Brazilian elderly subjects, whereas obesity is associated only with pre-frailty. Overweight seems to have a protective effect against the syndrome. The excess of abdominal fat is associated with both profiles independent of the BMI. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据