4.7 Article

Safety and feasibility of electrochemotherapy in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A pilot study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 26-32

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.033

关键词

Electrochemotherapy; Colorectal liver metastases; Liver; Outcome

类别

资金

  1. IGEA SpA, Carpi (MO), Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objectives: Electrochemotherapy is a novel ablation technique combining chemotherapeutic agents with reversible cell membrane electroporation. Previous experiences have shown its efficacy for cutaneous tumors. Its application for deep-seated malignancies is under investigation. We performed a prospective, pilot study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of intraoperative electrochemotherapy for otherwise unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Methods: Electrochemotherapy with bleomycin was combined with open liver resection and performed with linear or hexagonal needle electrodes according to an individualized pretreatment plan. The primary endpoints were: feasibility, as ratio of completed to planned treatments; safety, and efficacy, as per response assessed at 30 days with MRI and according to RECIST. The secondary endpoint was overall and progression-free survival at month 6. Results: A total of 9 colorectal liver metastases were treated in 5 patients with 20 electrode applications. No intraoperative complications were observed. At day 30, complete response was 55.5% and stable disease 45.5%. All (5) patients reached a 6 months overall survival, and 4 out of 5 patients had 6 months progression free survival. Conclusions: Electrochemotherapy is a feasible and safe adjunct to open surgery for treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Larger studies and longer follow-ups are favored to better define its role in the treatment of secondary liver malignancies. (C) 2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据