4.4 Article

E-fulfillment dimensions and its influence on customers in e-tailing: a critical review

期刊

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/APJML-11-2015-0167

关键词

Returns; Repurchase intention; Shopping satisfaction; E-fulfillment dimensions; Pure e-tailing

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to understand the dimensions of the e-fulfillment process and its influence on customers in pure e-tailing; to classify the pertinent literature that has evolved over time addressing relevant managerial issues; and to identify the gaps between the practices prevalent in the e-fulfillment and those suggested by academicians to develop insights for future research. Design/methodology/approach - A critical systemic literature review approach was used for the study with quantitative and qualitative analysis. Findings - The authors identified seven dimensions of e-fulfillment in the literature on pure e-tailing: e-business quality, product quality, pricing, availability, timeliness, condition and ease of return and explored its linkages with shopping satisfaction and repurchase intention of customers in e-tailing. Research limitations/implications - The study was skewed toward an empirical approach. The study does not include many of the analytical models in this space. Practical implications - This study helps e-tailers, academicians and practitioners understand critical dimensions of e-fulfillment and its influence on customers in the pure e-tailing setting in order to design customer-centric e-fulfillment architecture. Originality/value - The study identified seven dimensions of e-fulfillment in the literature and explored its influence on shopping satisfaction and repurchase intention of customers in pure e-tailing. This is the first compilation of standalone/isolated studies available in the literature to provide e-tailers and academicians meaningful insights into e-fulfillment in the pure e-tailing setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据