4.1 Article

Virtual brand community engagement practices: a refined typology and model

期刊

JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 204-217

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JSM-01-2016-0006

关键词

Netnography; Engagement practices; Virtual brand community

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - Despite Schau et al.' s (2009) pioneering research addressing consumers' community engagement practices, scholarly understanding of the nature and dynamics characterizing consumers' engagement practices in virtual (online) brand communities, and their inter-relationships, is limited to date. Building on these authors' study, this paper aims to develop a refined typology and process model of virtual brand community engagement practices (VBCEPs). Design/methodology/approach - Using the netnographic methodology, the authors analyze 20 luxury handbag community members' entries posted on the brand's particular section of The Purse Forum. Findings - The authors develop an eight- component VBCEP typology that refines Schau et al.' s (2009) four-component model of brand community engagement practices. The model comprises greeting, regulating, assisting, celebrating, appreciating, empathizing, minglingand ranking. These practices contribute to and maintain the community's vision and identity, and strengthen shared community consciousness. Research limitations/implications - A key limitation of this research lies in its findings being generated from a single, luxury virtual brand community. Future research may thus wish to validate the VBCEP typology and model across different contexts. Practical implications - The authors provide strategic managerial recommendations designed to leverage virtual brand community performance, which center predominantly on the social (altruistic) and achievement-based VBCEP sub-processes. Originality/value - The eight-component VBCEP typology refines Schau et al.' s four-component model of brand community engagement practices with particular applicability to virtual brand communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据