4.7 Article

Are merging black holes born from stellar collapse or previous mergers?

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 95, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124046

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through Einstein Postdoctoral Fellowship - Chandra X-ray Center [PF6-170152]
  2. NASA [NAS8-03060]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [PHY-1607130]
  4. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) under the IF Program [IF/00797/2014/CP1214/CT0012]
  5. H-MSCA-RISE Grant [StronGrHEP-690904]
  6. Sherman Fairchild Foundation
  7. Caltech
  8. NSF CAREER Award [PHY-1151197]
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Physics [1607130] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [IF/00797/2014/CP1214/CT0012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advanced LIGO detectors at Hanford and Livingston made two confirmed and one marginal detection of binary black holes during their first observing run. The first event, GW150914, was from the merger of two black holes much heavier that those whose masses have been estimated so far, indicating a formation scenario that might differ from ordinary stellar evolution. One possibility is that these heavy black holes resulted from a previous merger. When the progenitors of a black hole binary merger result from previous mergers, they should (on average) merge later, be more massive, and have spin magnitudes clustered around a dimensionless spin similar to 0.7. Here we ask the following question: can gravitational- wave observations determine whether merging black holes were born from the collapse of massive stars (first generation), rather than being the end product of earlier mergers (second generation)? We construct simple, observationally motivated populations of black hole binaries, and we use Bayesian model selection to show that measurements of the masses, luminosity distance (or redshift), and effective spin of black hole binaries can indeed distinguish between these different formation scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据