4.2 Article

Analysis of efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 0.75 mg stratified by sex in patients with type 2 diabetes in 2 randomized, controlled phase 3 studies in Japan

期刊

ENDOCRINE JOURNAL
卷 64, 期 5, 页码 553-560

出版社

JAPAN ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ16-0552

关键词

Dulaglutide; GLP-1 receptor agonist; Sex; Subgroup analysis; Type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. Eli Lilly K.K. (Kobe, Japan)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyzed the efficacy and safety of once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg by sex in 2 randomized, controlled phase 3 studies in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (a 52-week monotherapy study [comparator liraglutide 0.9 mg] and a 26-week combination therapy study [comparator insulin glargine]). Females comprised 18% of patients in the monotherapy study and 29% of patients in the combination therapy study. Mean reductions from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were similar between the sexes for dulaglutide- and liraglutide-treated patients (range -1.17% to -1.49%). Females had numerically greater weight loss or less weight gain than males across all treatment groups. The percentages of patients with reductions in both HbA1c and weight from baseline were also greater for females than for males in all treatment groups. In all treatment groups, the incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events tended to be greater among females than among males. No differences in the incidences of total or nocturnal hypoglycemia were observed between the sexes in any treatment group. Overall, in 2 studies in Japan, across all treatment groups it appeared that HbA1c lowering was unaffected by patient sex, while female patients had greater weight loss or less weight gain and greater incidence of adverse events, including nausea, compared to male patients. Incidences of patients discontinuing dulaglutide early due to adverse event were low (< 10%) for both sexes, and no new safety concerns related to dulaglutide were identified for either sex. Therefore, the benefit/risk ratio for dulaglutide remains unchanged, positive for both sexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据