4.6 Article

Electrochemical detection of Epinephrine using Polyaniline nanocomposite films doped with TiO2 and RuO2 Nanoparticles on Multi-walled Carbon Nanotube

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 331-348

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.031

关键词

Electrocatalysis; epinephrine; polyaniline composite; TiO2 and RuO2 nanoparticles; multiwalled carbon nanotube

资金

  1. NRF/Sasol Inzalo Science Foundation
  2. North-West University
  3. National Research Foundation of South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical properties of functionalized MWCNT/polyaniline doped with metal oxide (TiO2, RuO2) nanoparticles were explored. Successful synthesis of MWCNT, TiO2, RuO2, PANI, MWCNT-PANI-TiO2, and MWCNT-PANI-RuO2 nano materials were confirmed using suitable characterization techniques. Successful modification of gold (Au) electrode with these nanoparticles was confirmed using electrochemical techniques such as cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Au-MWCNT-PANI-TiO2 and Au-MWCNT-PANI-RuO2 gave the best electron transport properties towards the oxidation of epinephrine (EP) compared with other electrodes investigated. The Tafel values 0.448 and 0.442 V/decade for Au-MWCNT-PANI-TiO2 and Au-MWCNT-PANI-RuO2 electrodes respectively in (EP) suggest adsorption due to analyte oxidation intermediates products. The linear calibration plot was obtained for EP at concentrations range 4.9 to 76.9 mu M. The limits of detection of EP were estimated to be 0.16 and 0.18 mu M for Au-MWCNT-PANI-TiO2 and Au-MWCNT-PANI-RuO2 electrodes respectively. The interference study using DPV showed clear peak separation for amino acid (AA) and EP. Therefore, the modified electrodes can selectively detect epinephrine without interference from ascorbic acid signal. The analytical performance of the fabricated sensors has been evaluated for detection of epinephrine (EP) in a pharmaceutical sample with satisfactory results. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据