4.1 Article

Reported outcomes of children with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas treated with nimotuzumab and irinotecan

期刊

CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 893-897

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-017-3409-y

关键词

High-grade gliomas; Chemotherapy; Outcome; Nimotuzumab

资金

  1. Cancer Center of Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital
  2. Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The outcome of children with high-grade gliomas (HGGs) treated with radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy remains poor. The expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been established in children with HGGs. This report demonstrated the outcomes of adjuvant nimotuzumab, an EGFR inhibitor, with irinotecan in pediatric HGGs. Methods Children with newly diagnosed HGGs were enrolled. Two weeks after surgery, nimotuzumab with a dose of 150 mg/m(2) was given every week during radiation. After completion of radiation, a 4-week cycle of nimotuzumab (150 mg/m(2)) at week 1 and 3 and irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)) at week 1, 2, and 3 was given. Results Sixteen patients (5 females, 11 males), with a mean +/- SD age of 8.2 +/- 3.5 years were included. Tumors were located at the supratentorial region (50.0%), infratentorial region (43.8%), and both locations (6.2%). The 5-year PFS and OS were 19.9 +/- 11.6 and 31.5 +/- 13.0%, respectively. Median times of PFS and OS were 1.8 and 1.9 years, respectively. Prognostic factors related to good outcome were the location of tumor at the supratentorial region or outside brainstem and the extension of surgery. Side effects were minimal, with grade 1 anemia in three patients and diarrhea in one patient. Although, the adjuvant regimen of nimotuzumab and irinotecan slightly increases the overall outcome when compared to the historical study, the advantages of this protocol were minimal side effect, short period of hospitalization, and improved OS in patients who received extensive surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据