4.7 Article

MC-PPEA as a new and more potent inhibitor of CLP-induced sepsis and pulmonary inflammation than FK866

期刊

DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 629-641

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S125349

关键词

NAMPT; pulmonary inflammation; sepsis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL 080042]
  2. William R Brown/Missouri Endowment of The Children's Mercy Hospital, University of Missouri Kansas City

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our previous study indicated that overexpression of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) aggravated acute lung injury, while knockdown of NAMPT expression attenuated ventilator-induced lung injury. Recently, we found that meta-carborane-butyl-3-(3-pyridinyl)-2E-propenamide (MC-PPEA, MC4), in which the benzoylpiperidine moiety of FK866 has been replaced by a carborane, displayed a 100-fold increase in NAMPT inhibition over FK866. Here, we determined the effects of MC4 and FK866 on cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) surgery-induced sepsis in C57BL/6J mice. MC4 showed stronger inhibitory effects than FK866 on CLP-induced mortality, serum tumor necrosis factor a (TNF alpha) levels, pulmonary myeloperoxidase activity, alveolar injury, and interleukin 6 and interleukin1 beta messenger RNA levels. In vitro cell permeability and electric cell-substrate impedance sensing assays demonstrated that MC4 inhibited TNF alpha- and thrombin-mediated pulmonary endothelial cell permeability better than FK866. MC4 also exerted more potent effects than FK866, at concentrations as low as 0.3 nM, to attenuate TNF alpha-mediated intracellular cytokine expression, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) and its reduced form NADH levels, and nuclear factor kappa B p65 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation in A549 cells. Our results strongly suggest that the newly developed MC4 is a more potent suppressor of CLP-induced pulmonary inflammation and sepsis than FK866, with potential clinical application as a new treatment agent for sepsis and inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据