4.2 Review

Particle-based delivery of the HIV envelope protein

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN HIV AND AIDS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 265-271

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000366

关键词

antibody responses; Env delivery; liposomes; nanoparticles; virus-like particles

资金

  1. European Union [681032]
  2. Bill AMP
  3. Melinda Gates Foundation Poxvirus T-Cell Vaccine Discovery Consortium (PTVDC) [38599]
  4. University of Regensburg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review A major focus in HIV vaccine research is the development of suitable antigens that elicit broadly neutralizing antibody responses targeting HIV's envelope protein (Env). Delivery of Env in a repetitive manner on particle-based carriers allows higher avidity interactions and is therefore expected to efficiently engage B cells, thus leading to affinity maturation that results in superior antibody responses characterized by improved breadth, potency, and durability. This review summarizes current work that is evaluating diverse types of such particulate carriers for Env delivery. Recent findings Various types of particle scaffolds are being investigated, encompassing group-specific antigen-derived virus-like particles, bacteria-derived proteins that self-assemble into symmetrical nanoparticles, as well as liposomes assembled from membrane components and recombinantly produced Env isoforms. Env-derived antigens from peptides over selected isolates to improved, stabilized next-generation designer Envs have been attached to such carriers. Immunological evaluation in animal models showed that these structures often elicit superior humoral immune responses. Summary The findings reviewed here emphasize the potential of particle-based delivery modalities to elicit better antibody responses. Together with advances in Env antigen design, these approaches may synergistically act together on the way to obtain vaccine candidates that potentially induce protective immune responses against HIV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据